Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 167 (2):271 - 315 (2009)
|Abstract||Deductive inference is usually regarded as being "tautological" or "analytical": the information conveyed by the conclusion is contained in the information conveyed by the premises. This idea, however, clashes with the undecidability of first-order logic and with the (likely) intractability of Boolean logic. In this article, we address the problem both from the semantic and the proof-theoretical point of view. We propose a hierarchy of propositional logics that are all tractable (i.e. decidable in polynomial time), although by means of growing computational resources, and converge towards classical propositional logic. The underlying claim is that this hierarchy can be used to represent increasing levels of "depth" or "informativeness" of Boolean reasoning. Special attention is paid to the most basic logic in this hierarchy, the pure "intelim logic", which satisfies all the requirements of a natural deduction system (allowing both introduction and elimination rules for each logical operator) while admitting of a feasible (quadratic) decision procedure. We argue that this logic is "analytic" in a particularly strict sense, in that it rules out any use of "virtual information", which is chiefly responsible for the combinatorial explosion of standard classical systems. As a result, analyticity and tractability are reconciled and growing degrees of computational complexity are associated with the depth at which the use of virtual information is allowed.|
|Keywords||Boolean logic Tractability Semantic information Analytical reasoning Natural deduction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marcello D.’Agostino & Luciano Floridi (2009). The Enduring Scandal of Deduction. Synthese 167 (2):271 - 315.
James W. Garson (2010). Expressive Power and Incompleteness of Propositional Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):159-171.
Torben BraÜner (2005). Natural Deduction for First-Order Hybrid Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (2):173-198.
Kosta Došen (1992). Modal Logic as Metalogic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (3):173-201.
Athanassios Tzouvaras (1996). Aspects of Analytic Deduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):581 - 596.
Peter Milne (1994). Classical Harmony: Rules of Inference and the Meaning of the Logical Constants. Synthese 100 (1):49 - 94.
Andrzej Indrzejczak (2003). A Labelled Natural Deduction System for Linear Temporal Logic. Studia Logica 75 (3):345 - 376.
Greg Restall & Francesco Paoli (2005). The Geometry of Non-Distributive Logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1108 - 1126.
Merlijn Sevenster (2006). On the Computational Consequences of Independence in Propositional Logic. Synthese 149 (2):257 - 283.
Peter Lohmann & Heribert Vollmer (2013). Complexity Results for Modal Dependence Logic. Studia Logica 101 (2):343-366.
Mark Jago (2012). The Content of Deduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42:317-334.
G. Aldo Antonelli & Richmond H. Thomason (2002). Representability in Second-Order Propositional Poly-Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):1039-1054.
Allard Tamminga (1994). Logics of Rejection: Two Systems of Natural Deduction. Logique Et Analyse 146:169-208.
Maria Luisa Bonet & Samuel R. Buss (1993). The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near-Linear Proof Simulations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):688-709.
Yannis Delmas-Rigoutsos (1997). A Double Deduction System for Quantum Logic Based on Natural Deduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):57-67.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 739,155 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,155 )
How can I increase my downloads?