David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 69 (3):587-589 (2009)
This work provides a rigorous analysis of what Tuomela calls ‘the we-perspective’. Tuomela's overarching project is to argue that ‘conceptualizing social life and theorizing about it requires the use of group concepts, indeed the we-perspective and, especially, the we-mode.’ Already some of the complexities of Tuomela's approach will be evident – viz. in the distinction, implied in the above quotation and carried through systematically throughout the work, between the ‘we-perspective’ and the ‘we-mode’. For, indeed, it is possible, on his account, to take up the we-perspective from the I-mode and, indeed, this is probably quite common, but is not adequate to ground the analysis of social and institutional concepts. As Tuomela puts it , ‘The concept of social institution is a we-mode concept, and in actual practice, at least some we-mode thinking and acting is required for institutions to function adequately.’ Since ‘we-mode’ is the more central notion, let us begin with that. It will be instructive to quote Tuomela at length : " Agent A, a member of group g, has ATT, the attitude ATT with content p, in … ".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Shockley (2008). Review of Raimo Tuomela, The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
R. Tuomela (2010). The We-Mode Approach: A Response to John Wettersten's Review of The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):513-517.
J. Wettersten (2009). Book Review: Tuomela, Raimo. (2007). The Philosophy of Sociality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):531-534.
Raimo Tuomela (2002). Collective Goals and Communicative Action. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:29-64.
William Rehg (2013). The Social Authority of Paradigms as Group Commitments: Rehabilitating Kuhn with Recent Social Philosophy. Topoi 32 (1):21-31.
Raimo Tuomela (2000). Collective and Joint Intention. Mind and Society 1 (2):39-69.
J. Wettersten (2010). Reply to Tuomela. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):518-522.
Raimo Tuomela (1991). We Will Do It. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (2):249-277.
Michael Bratman (2009). Modest Sociality and the Distinctiveness of Intention. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):149 - 165.
Larry May & Raimo Tuomela (2007). Introduction. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):365–368.
Raimo Tuomela (1974). Human Action and its Explanation. Institute of Philosophy, University of Helsinki].
Raimo Tuomela (1997). Socializing Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):725-729.
Raimo Tuomela (1988). Free Riding and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Journal of Philosophy 85 (8):421-427.
Raimo Tuomela (1991). We Will Do It: An Analysis of Group-Intentions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (2):249-277.
Added to index2010-12-11
Total downloads29 ( #130,329 of 1,790,253 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #59,364 of 1,790,253 )
How can I increase my downloads?