David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):375-390 (2007)
The emergence of intelligent software agents that operate autonomously with little or no human intervention has generated many doctrinal questions at a conceptual level and has challenged the traditional rules of contract especially those relating to the intention as an essential requirement of any contract conclusion. In this paper, we will try to explore some of these challenges, and shed light on the conflict between the traditional contract theory and the transactional practice in the case of using intelligent software agents. We will try further to examine how intelligent software agents differ from other software applications, and consider then how such differences are legally relevant. This paper, however, is not intended to provide the final answer to all questions and challenges in this regard, but to identify the main components, and provide perspectives on how to deal with such issue.
|Keywords||Intelligent agent Contract Intention Subjective theory Objective theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John R. Searle (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Lawrence B. Solum (1992). Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences. North Carolina Law Review 70:1231.
Citations of this work BETA
Jaap Hage (2011). A Model of Juridical Acts: Part 1: The World of Law. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):23-48.
Similar books and articles
Elisabetta Zibetti, Vicenç Quera, Charles Tijus & Francesc Salvador Beltran (2001). Reasoning Based on Categorisation for Interpreting and Acting: A First Approach. Mind and Society 2 (2):87-104.
Nicholas Kushmerick (1997). Software Agents and Their Bodies. Minds and Machines 7 (2):227-247.
Alexander Serenko, Umar Ruhi & Mihail Cocosila (2006). Unplanned Effects of Intelligent Agents on Internet Use: A Social Informatics Approach. [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (1-2):141-166.
Frances Brazier, Anja Oskamp, Corien Prins, Maurice Schellekens & Niek Wijngaards (2004). Anonymity and Software Agents: An Interdisciplinary Challenge. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):137-157.
Vincent C. Müller (2007). Is There a Future for AI Without Representation? Minds and Machines 17 (1):101-115.
Elliott Sober (2008). Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
Mr Sahon Bhattacharyya, Intelligent Agents in Military, Defense and Warfare: Ethical Issues and Concerns.
Alexander Serenko & Brian Detlor (2004). Intelligent Agents as Innovations. AI and Society 18 (4):364-381.
Giovanni Sartor (2009). Cognitive Automata and the Law: Electronic Contracting and the Intentionality of Software Agents. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):253-290.
Emad Abdel Rahim Dahiyat (2010). Intelligent Agents and Liability: Is It a Doctrinal Problem or Merely a Problem of Explanation? [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (1):103-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #256,425 of 1,790,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #433,815 of 1,790,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?