On morality of speech: Cavell's critique of Derrida [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101 (2011)
This article tries to bring out the implication of Cavell’s critical comments on Derrida, clustered around Cavell’s charge that deconstruction entails a flight from the ordinary. Cavell’s and Derrida’s different readings of Austin’s ordinary language philosophy provide a common ground for elaborating their respective positions. Their writings are at once the closest but also the most divergent when addressing the moral implication of speech, or more precisely, when addressing their understanding of responsibility and voice. Employing Derrida’s so-called ‘double reading’ as a leitmotif will not only shed light on the moral dimension of deconstruction, but also bring the central target of Cavell’s critique into the open
|Keywords||Cavell Derrida Morality Deconstruction Ordinary language philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Fischer (1989). Stanley Cavell and Literary Skepticism. University of Chicago Press.
Lawrence F. Rhu (2006). Stanley Cavell's American Dream: Shakespeare, Philosophy, and Hollywood Movies. Fordham University Press.
Espen Dahl (2010). On Acknowledgement and Cavell's Unacknowledged Theological Voice. Heythrop Journal 51 (6):931-945.
Martin Gustafsson (2005). Perfect Pitch and Austinian Examples: Cavell, McDowell, Wittgenstein, and the Philosophical Significance of Ordinary Language. Inquiry 48 (4):356 – 389.
Timothy Gould (2007). Present Tense: Working with Cavell. Reading Cavell Edited by Crary, Alice, and Sanford Shieh. Contending with Stanley Cavell Edited by Goodman, Russell B.. Cavell on Film Edited by Rothman, William. [REVIEW] Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):229–233.
Vasso Kindi (2010). Novelty and Revolution in Art and Science: The Connection Between Kuhn and Cavell. Perspectives on Science 18 (3):284-310.
Nancy Bauer (2006). How to Do Things With Pornography. In Sanford Shieh & Alice Crary (eds.), Reading Cavell.
Davide Sparti (2000). Responsiveness as Responsibility: Cavell's Reading of Wittgenstein and King Lear as a Source for an Ethics of Interpersonal Relationships. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):81-107.
Ian Munday (2010). Improvisation in the Disorders of Desire: Performativity, Passion and Moral Education. Ethics and Education 5 (3):281 - 297.
Ian Munday (2009). Passionate Utterance and Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):57-74.
Stanley Cavell (2005). Cavell on Film. State University of New York Press.
Stanley Cavell & Russell B. Goodman (eds.) (2005). Contending with Stanley Cavell. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-02-19
Total downloads30 ( #59,687 of 1,103,223 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #121,213 of 1,103,223 )
How can I increase my downloads?