David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ratio Juris 22 (2):187-196 (2009)
Abstract. The analysis of legal statements that are made from an "internal point of view" must distinguish statements where legal obedience is accepted from statements where legal obedience is only assumed. Statements that are based on accepted obedience supply reasons for action, but statements where obedience is merely assumed can never provide reasons for action. It is argued in this paper that John Searle neglects this distinction. Searle claims that a statement from the internal point of view provides the speaker with reasons for actions that are "self-sufficient" in the sense that they are independent of the speaker's beliefs and desires. This claim is mistaken. A statement that is based on assumed obedience is self-sufficient, but does not give reasons for action. A statement that is based on accepted obedience gives reasons for action, but these reasons are not self-sufficient.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
T. Nagel (1970). Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University Press.
John R. Searle, Barry Smith, Leo Zaibert & Josef Moural (2001). Rationality in Action: A Symposium. Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66 – 94.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Huw Price (2010). Truth as Convenient Friction. In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Columbia University Press 167--190.
Nico Keijzer (1978). Military Obedience. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, [International Publishers].
Miguel Pina E. Cunha, Arménio Rego & Stewart R. Clegg (2010). Obedience and Evil: From Milgram and Kampuchea to Normal Organizations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):291-309.
William A. Edmundson (2010). Political Authority, Moral Powers and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):179-191.
Louis Roy (2012). Does Christian Faith Rule Out Human Autonomy? Heythrop Journal 53 (4):606-623.
Peter R. Baelz (1973). Christian Obedience in a Permissive Context. London,Athlone Press.
David Berman (1986). The Jacobitism of Berkeley's Passive Obedience. Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (2):309-319.
Dorothee Sölle (1970). Beyond Mere Obedience. Minneapolis,Augsburg Pub. House.
Joseph Shaw (2002). The Virtue of Obedience. Religious Studies 38 (1):63-75.
Added to index2009-06-16
Total downloads26 ( #145,382 of 1,793,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?