Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2008)
|Abstract||Barry Dainton presents a fascinating new account of the self, the key to which is experiential or phenomenal continuity. Provided our mental life continues we can easily imagine ourselves surviving the most dramatic physical alterations, or even moving from one body to another. It was this fact that led John Locke to conclude that a credible account of our persistence conditions - an account which reflects how we actually conceive of ourselves - should be framed in terms of mental rather than material continuity. But mental continuity comes in different forms. Most of Locke's contemporary followers agree that our continued existence is secured by psychological continuity, which they take to be made up of memories, beliefs, intentions, personality traits, and the like. Dainton argues that that a better and more believable account can be framed in terms of the sort of continuity we find in our streams of consciousness from moment to moment. Why? Simply because provided this continuity is not lost - provided our streams of consciousness flow on - we can easily imagine ourselves surviving the most dramatic psychological alterations. Phenomenal continuity seems to provide a more reliable guide to our persistence than any form of continuity. The Phenomenal Self is a full-scale defence and elaboration of this premise. The first task is arriving at an adequate understanding of phenomenal unity and continuity. This achieved, Dainton turns to the most pressing problem facing any experience-based approach: losses of consciousness. How can we survive them? He shows how the problem can be solved in a satisfactory manner by construing ourselves as systems of experiential capacities. He then moves on to explore a range of further issues. How simple can a self be? How are we related to our bodies? Is our persistence an all-or-nothing affair? Do our minds consist of parts which could enjoy an independent existence? Is it metaphysically intelligible to construe ourselves as systems of capacities? The book concludes with a novel treatment of fission and fusion|
|Keywords||Self (Philosophy Phenomenalism Phenomenology Self|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$16.27 used (87% off) $28.04 new (78% off) $117.56 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD450.D263 2008|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Louis N. Sandowsky (2006). Hume and Husserl: The Problem of the Continuity or Temporalization of Consciousness. International Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 46, No. 1, Issue 181 (March 2006) 46 (181):59-74.
Barry F. Dainton (2004). The Self and the Phenomenal. Ratio 17 (4):365-89.
Marc Slors (1998). Two Conceptions of Psychological Continuity. Philosophical Explorations 1 (1):61 – 80.
Barry F. Dainton (2004). Higher-Order Consciousness and Phenomenal Space: Reply to Meehan. Psyche 10 (1).
Oliver Rashbrook (2013). Diachronic and Synchronic Unity. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):465-484.
Oliver Rashbrook (forthcoming). The Continuity of Consciousness. European Journal of Philosophy.
Barry F. Dainton (2000). Stream of Consciousness: Unity and Continuity in Conscious Experience. Routledge.
Johan E. Gustafsson (2011). Phenomenal Continuity and the Bridge Problem. Philosophia 39 (2):289–296.
Barry F. Dainton & Timothy J. Bayne (2005). Consciousness as a Guide to Personal Persistence. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):549-571.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,949 of 739,443 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,443 )
How can I increase my downloads?