Unity in the void: Reply to Revonsuo
Psyche 10 (1) (2004)
| Abstract | While agreeing with me on many issues, Revonsuo rejects my claim that phenomenal states could be co-conscious without being spatially related (in experience). In defence of my claim I described a thought-experiment in which | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAntti Revonsuo (2003). Consciousness as Phenomenal Ether? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):422-423.
Barry F. Dainton (2000). Stream of Consciousness: Unity and Continuity in Conscious Experience. Routledge.
Antti Revonsuo & K. Tarkko (2002). Binding in Dreams: The Bizarreness of Dream Images and the Unity of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (7):3-24.
J. A. Cheyne (2000). Play, Dreams, and Simulation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):918-919.
Antti Revonsuo (2001). Discovering the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Reply to Commentaries. Journal Of Consciousness Studies 8 (3):44-50.
Peter Chapman & Geoffrey Underwood (2000). Mental States During Dreaming and Daydreaming: Some Methodological Loopholes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):917-918.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,474 of 549,014 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,160 of 549,014 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
