David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 14 (1):1-12 (1999)
: This article critiques Elizabeth Grosz's understanding that queer theory is unproductive insofar as it disrupts the specific identities of gay and lesbian. Reconsidering ideas about desire, the body, and identity that Grosz takes from Gilles Deleuze's work on Friedrich Nietzsche and Baruch Spinoza, this essay argues that, despite her productive reworking of homophobia in terms of "active" and "reactive" forces, Grosz's application of Spinoza is only partial. Focusing on Spinoza's evaluation of bodies, the essay both critiques Grosz's approach to experimental desire and observes Spinozist preoccupations in order to talk about the experimental body. It concludes that if Grosz were to attend more seriously to the Spinozist imperative to analyze a body in terms of its capabilities—that is, its power to be affected—the epistemological basis of her argument would change. It would be difficult to dismiss the plurality and sensibility of a queer body or its challenge to lesbian and gay as the source of a primary identity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hasana Sharp (2011). Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. The University of Chicago Press.
Tom Sparrow (2010). A Physiology of Encounters: Spinoza, Nietzsche, and Strange Alliances. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):165-186.
Catriona Sandilands (2001). Desiring Nature, Queering Ethics. Environmental Ethics 23 (2):169-188.
Annamarie Jagose (1996). Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York University Press.
Evelien Geerts, Forcefully Subverting or Reinforcing Dichotomies? Elizabeth Grosz‟s Feminist Rereading of Charles Darwin, Via the Perspectives of Jacques Derrida and Luce Irigaray.
Claire Colebrook (2000). From Radical Representations to Corporeal Becomings: The Feminist Philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz, and Gatens. Hypatia 15 (2):76-93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #66,351 of 1,100,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #19,498 of 1,100,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?