Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct” [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):158-160 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-999-0004-y

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on “six domains of research ethics”.Sheila Slaughter - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):219-222.
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct”. [REVIEW]Allan C. Shipp - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):155-157.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Commentary on 'developing a federal policy on research misconduct' (s. francis).Kenneth J. Ryan - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):273-274.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct.David H. Guston - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):137-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#556,922)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Research misconduct: Why are definitions so elusive?Robert Hauptman - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):443-444.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references