The methodology of genuine modal realism

Synthese 162 (1):37 - 52 (2008)
David Lewis’s genuine modal realism is a controversial thesis in modal metaphysics. Charles Chihara and Ross Cameron have each argued that Lewis’s defence of his thesis involves his committing serious methodological errors; in particular, that his replies to two well-known and important objections are question-begging. Scott Shalkowski has further argued that Lewis’s attempt to analyse modal talk in non-modal terms is viciously circular. This paper considers the methodology which Lewis uses to argue for his thesis, and the paper tries to show that it is guilty of no methodological errors.
Keywords Lewis  Modal realism  Chihara  Cameron  Shalkowski  Question-begging  Epistemology  Circularity
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    John Divers (1997). The Analysis of Possibility and the Possibility of Analysis. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):141–160.
    Alvin Plantinga (1979). De Essentia. Grazer Philosophische Studien 7:101-121.

    View all 12 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    Sam Cowling (2013). Ideological Parsimony. Synthese 190 (17):3889-3908.
    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    79 ( #13,683 of 1,088,400 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    3 ( #30,936 of 1,088,400 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.