David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 48 (3):221-235 (2009)
In this paper I compare two very different deployments of love in ethics. Swami Vivekananda's concept of ethical love ties into the project of constructing an alternative masculinity for a colonized people; while feminist care ethics uses love to escape the perceived masculinity of traditional ethical theory. Using Kenneth Goodpaster's distinction between ‘framework questions’ and ‘application questions,’ I try to show that love in Practical Vedanta addresses the former while feminist care ethics concerns itself with the latter. Even though this difference, I suggest, could be a function of their varying historical-political contexts, the two issues need to be taken together for a more complete understanding of the ethical subject.
|Keywords||Swami Vivekananda Feminist care ethics Practical Vedanta Identification Relational self|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Cheshire Calhoun (1988). Justice, Care, Gender Bias. Journal of Philosophy 85 (9):451-463.
Vrinda Dalmiya (2000). Loving Paradoxes: A Feminist Reclamation of the Goddess Kali. Hypatia 15 (1):125-150.
Kenneth E. Goodpaster (1978). On Being Morally Considerable. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):308-325.
Virginia Held (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford University Press.
Eva Feder Kittay, Carol Gilligan, Annette C. Baier, Michael Stocker, Christina H. Sommers, Kathryn Pyne Addelson, Virginia Held, Thomas E. Hill Jr, Seyla Benhabib, George Sher, Marilyn Friedman, Jonathan Adler, Sara Ruddick, Mary Fainsod, David D. Laitin, Lizbeth Hasse & Sandra Harding (1989). Women and Moral Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marguerite La Caze (2005). Love, That Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect. Hypatia 20 (3):92-114.
Carol S. Robb (1981). A Framework for Feminist Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):48 - 68.
Carter Heyward (1996). Lamenting the Loss of Love: A Response to Colin Grant. Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):23 - 28.
Susan Mendus (2000). Feminism and Emotion: Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy. St. Martin's Press.
Melissa Seymour Fahmy (2010). Kantian Practical Love. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):313-331.
James M. Kouzes & Barry Z. Posner (1992). Ethical Leaders: An Essay About Being in Love. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):479-484.
Virginia Held (1999). Feminist Ethical Theory. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:41-49.
William K. Frankena (1973). The Ethics of Love Conceived as an Ethics of Virtue. Journal of Religious Ethics 1:21 - 36.
Nathan Nobis (2005). Feminist Ethics Without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “Φ Ethics Without Φ Ethical Theory”). Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):213-225.
Added to index2009-04-06
Total downloads39 ( #43,844 of 1,101,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,941 of 1,101,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?