David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):117-126 (2013)
This study investigates how ownership concentration in European multinational firms is associated with these firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). We employ factor analysis on responsibility data from EIRiS and use a regression analysis. Using firm-level data for almost 700 European firms, we find that shareholder concentration is significantly related to such policies. That is, more concentrated ownership goes hand in hand with poorer CSR policies. In our analysis, we control for size, leverage, profitability, industry, and country of origin. We use several indicators for ownership concentration. We also find that with more concentrated ownership, CSR of the firm gets worse. We suggest that especially with large shareholders, CSR would need to be included in their performance assessment
|Keywords||Blockholders Concentrated ownership Corporate social responsibility Europe Multinational enterprises|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Amir Barnea & Amir Rubin (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):71 - 86.
Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington (2005). Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 61 (1):29 - 44.
Stephen Brammer, Stephen Pavelin & Lynda Porter (2005). Corporate Social Performance and Geographical Diversification. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:81-86.
Betty S. Coffey & Gerald E. Fryxell (1991). Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (6):437 - 444.
Maretno A. Harjoto & Hoje Jo (2011). Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (1):45 - 67.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maria Lai-Ling Lam (2007). A Study of the Transfer of Corporate Social Responsibility From Well-Established Foreign Multinational Enterprises to Chinese Subsidiaries. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:343-363.
Qi Li, Wei Luo, Yaping Wang & Liansheng Wu (2013). Firm Performance, Corporate Ownership, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in China. Business Ethics 22 (1):159-173.
J. Félix Lozano & Alejandra Boni (2002). The Impact of the Multinational in the Development: An Ethical Challenge. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):169 - 178.
Mette Morsing & Francesco Perrini (2009). CSR in SMEs: Do SMEs Matter for the CSR Agenda? Business Ethics 18 (1):1-6.
Francis Weyzig (2009). Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the Csr Agenda. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):417 - 428.
Mari Kondo (2007). CSR Initiatives of Japanese Multinational Enterprises in a Developing Country. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:179-182.
Won Yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang & Aleksey Martynov (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence From Korea. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):283-297.
Daewook Kim & Myung-Il Choi (2013). A Comparison of Young Publics' Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of Multinational Corporations in the United States and South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):105-118.
Carmen Stoian & Rodica Milena Zaharia (2012). CSR Development in Post-Communist Economies: Employees' Expectations Regarding Corporate Socially Responsible Behaviour – the Case of Romania. Business Ethics 21 (4):380-401.
Wenjing Li & Ran Zhang (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):631 - 645.
Rob van Tulder, Jeroen van Wijk & Ans Kolk (2009). From Chain Liability to Chain Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):399-412.
Rob Van Tulder, Jeroen Van Wijk & Ans Kolk (2009). From Chain Liability to Chain Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S2):399 - 412.
Nelarine Cornelius, Mathew Todres, Shaheena Janjuha-Jivraj, Adrian Woods & James Wallace (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):355 - 370.
Mathew Todres Nelarine Cornelius, Adrian Woods Shaheena Janjuha-Jivraj & James Wallace (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2).
Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati (2007). Formal Vs. Informal CSR Strategies. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:245-250.
Added to index2012-11-30
Total downloads3 ( #308,184 of 1,102,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,049 of 1,102,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?