S-R contiguity and delay of reinforcement as critical parameters in classical aversive conditioning

Psychological Review 74 (5):420-427 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0024895

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contiguity and reinforcement in relation to CS-UCS intervals in classical aversive conditioning.Joan E. Jones - 1962 - Psychological Review 69 (3):176-185.
Stimulus-response contiguity in classical aversive conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):35.
Classical aversive conditioning of human digital volume-pulse change and tests of the preparatory-adaptive-response interpretation of reinforcement.John J. Furedy & Anthony N. Doob - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):403.
A delay of reinforcement gradient and correlated reinforcement in the instrumental conditioning of conversational behavior.Robert F. Weiss, Jenny L. Boyer, James T. Colwick & Dennis J. Moran - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):33.
Amount, delay, and position of delay of reinforcement as parameters of runway performance.Eugene R. Wist - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (2):160.
Replicability of an optimal delay of reinforcement result in instrumental eyelid conditioning.Louise E. Cerekwicki, Barry H. Kantowitz & David A. Grant - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):189.
Semantic differential judgments of single and multiple conditioned stimuli with an aversive delay conditioning paradigm.Robert C. Bobbitt & Robert C. Beck - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):398.
Escape performance as a function of delay of reinforcement.Harry Fowler & Milton A. Trapold - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (5):464.
The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning.Sally L. Perry & John W. Moore - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):158.
Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to the law of effect.R. Allen Gardner & Beatrix T. Gardner - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):429.
Delay of positive reinforcement in instrumental eyelid conditioning.Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):360.
Heart rate and somatic-motor coupling during classical aversive conditioning in humans.Paul A. Obrist - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):180.
Steep delay of reinforcement gradient in escape conditioning with altruistic reinforcement.Robert Frank Weiss, Joe Shelby Cecil & Marcy J. Frank - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):372-374.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
2 (#1,784,141)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references