Contrasting consequences: Bringing charges of sexual harassment compared with other cases of whistleblowing [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):151 - 158 (1990)
The phenomenon of whistleblowing seems puzzling in that whistleblowing presumably brings a wrongful practice to the attention of those with power to correct the situation. In this respect, whistleblowers act to serve the public interest in defeating harmful, illegal and unjust practices. Yet these persons suffer vilification and worse, not only from their fellow employees, but from members of the general public as well. Cases in which members of a discriminated minority report instances of job discrimination, and especially instances of sexual harassment resemble other cases in which an employee reports corporate or bureaucratic misdeeds. In the early 1970s those who brought charges of sexual harassment did suffer character assassination, reprisals and difficulties in finding equivalent employment afterwards. But by the mid-1980s, consequences for those bringing discrimination charges, and especially the charge of sexual harassment have come to differ in several important respects from other cases of whistleblowing. Examining the differences, and what seem to be underlying causes of these differences, provides some insight into the factors that set limits to the practice of whistleblowing in a democratic society.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tim Barnett (1992). A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship Between Selected Organizational Characteristics and External Whistleblowing by Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):949 - 959.
Grant Miles (1993). In Search of Ethical Profits: Insights From Strategic Management. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (3):219 - 225.
Similar books and articles
Christine L. Williams (2002). Sexual Harassment and Sadomasochism. Hypatia 17 (2):99-117.
Vaughana Macy Feary (1994). Sexual Harassment: Why the Corporate World Still Doesn't “Get It”. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):649 - 662.
Myrtle P. Bell, Mary E. Mclaughlin & Jennifer M. Sequeira (2002). Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):65 - 76.
Brian B. Stanko & Mark Schneider (1999). Sexual Harassment in the Public Accounting Profession? Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):185 - 200.
Margaret Crouch (2009). Sexual Harassment in Public Places. Social Philosophy Today 25:137-148.
S. Gayle Baugh (1997). On the Persistence of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):899-908.
Karen A. Crain & Kenneth A. Heischmidt (1995). Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):299 - 308.
M. J. Booker (1998). Can Sexual Harassment Be Salvaged? Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1171-1177.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #123,603 of 1,796,271 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,138 of 1,796,271 )
How can I increase my downloads?