Dissuasion as a Rhetorical Technique of Creating a General Disposition to Inaction

Argumentation 23 (1):1-9 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, it is argued that the classical rhetorical framework undergoes a transformation because of an important change in Western thought. Following this hypothesis, I analyze a rhetorical notion of “dissuasion” as a rhetorical technique of creating a “general disposition to inaction” in addition to a classical rhetorical notion of “dissuasion” that aims at “refraining from an action”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Letting Rhetoric Be: On Rhetoric and Rhetoricity.Christian O. Lundberg - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (2):247-255.
The Rhetoric of Evolutionary Theory.David J. Depew - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):380-389.
Argument and Rhetoric in Philosophy.David M. Holley - 1982 - Philosophy Today 26 (3):272-281.
Dialectical Rhetoric and Rhetorical Rhetoric.Carl B. Holmberg - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (4):232 - 243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
32 (#485,568)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy.Bernard Williams - 2002 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen Toulmin - 1958 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sour grapes: studies in the subversion of rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality.Jon Elster - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references