Diversity in Representations; Uniformity in Learning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):330-331 (2010)
Henrich et al.'s conclusion that psychologists ought not assume uniformity of psychological phenomena depends on their descriptive claim that there is no pattern to the great diversity in psychological phenomena. We argue that there is a pattern: uniformity of learning processes (broadly construed), and diversity of (some) mental contents (broadly construed)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X10000075
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive David Danks, Diversity in Representations; Uniformity in Learning
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
David Lea (2002). Tully and de Soto on Uniformity and Diversity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):55–68.
I. Kalin (2011). Religion, Unity and Diversity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (4):471-478.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

68 ( #47,914 of 1,725,472 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #45,586 of 1,725,472 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.