Hell and Vagueness

Faith and Philosophy 19 (1):58--68 (2002)
Abstract
A certain conception of Hell is inconsistent with God's traditional attributes. My argument is novel in focusing on considerations involving vagueness. God is in charge of the selection procedure, so the selection procedure must be just; any just procedure will have borderline cases; but according to the traditional conception, the afterlife is binary and has no borderline cases.
Keywords Hell  vagueness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil20021918
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,680
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nicole Hassoun (2015). Eternally Separated Lovers: The Argument From Love. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):633-643.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

173 ( #18,681 of 1,790,003 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #68,756 of 1,790,003 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.