Masculine and feminine voices: Making ethical decisions in the care of the dying [Book Review]

Abstract
Drawing on the example of one specific Ethics Committee, the author delineates feminine and masculine styles of ethical decision making and work with the dying as two sides of what it means to be humanistic in patient care. The author draws particularly on the work of Carol Gilligan to differentiate feminine from masculine approaches
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,374
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
John W. Cooper (2000). Supplemental but Not Equal. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):116-125.
Mary C. Rawlinson (1982). Psychiatric Discourse and the Feminine Voice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (2):153-178.
Nel Noddings (1987). Do We Really Want to Produce Good People? Journal of Moral Education 16 (3):177-188.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-30

Total downloads

7 ( #180,536 of 1,096,858 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #53,842 of 1,096,858 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.