Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Behavior 12 (2):167 – 176 (2002)
|Abstract||This article discusses the ethical and methodological issues associated with boredom experienced by human participants during psychological experiments. Ways are suggested in which informed consent, briefing, and debriefing can be used to prevent or remedy boredom induced during experiments. We address methodological and ethical concerns, and we discuss the advantages of the proposed approach for experimenters' practice and training of undergraduate students. Future directions for much needed research on these topics are also emphasized.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul M. McNeill (1993). The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. Cambridge University Press.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (2006). Experimentation on Humans and Nonhumans. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):333-355.
Dennis John Mazur (2007). Evaluating the Science and Ethics of Research on Humans: A Guide for Irb Members. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Paul Gibbs (2011). The Concept of Profound Boredom: Learning From Moments of Vision. Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (6):601-613.
Kevin Aho (2007). Simmel on Acceleration, Boredom, and Extreme Aesthesia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (4):447-462.
Tibor Scitovsky (1996). My Own Criticism Ofthe Joyless Economy. Critical Review 10 (4):595-605.
Sue P. Stafford & Wanda Torres Gregory (2006). Heidegger's Phenomenology of Boredom, and the Scientific Investigation of Conscious Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (2):155-169.
Lisa Bortolotti & Yujin Nagasawa (2009). Immortality Without Boredom. Ratio 22 (3):261-277.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 732,277 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 732,277 )
How can I increase my downloads?