New York, Meridian Books (1960)
|Abstract||Now it is of the utmost importance to observe that expressions peculiar to a science will possess meanings that are fixed by its own procedures, and that are therefore intelligible in terms of its own rules of usage, whether or not the science has ...|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arthur Fine (1988). Interpreting Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:3 - 11.
Evandro Agazzi & Christian Thiel (eds.) (2006). Operations and Constructions in Science: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Academy of the Philosophy of Science, Erlangen/Germany, 17-19 September 2004. [REVIEW] Universitätsbund Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Henri Poincaré (1946). The Foundations of Science: Science and Hypothesis, the Value of Science, Science and Method. Lancaster, Pa.,The Science Press.
W. J. Mander (1991). F. H. Bradley and the Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):65 – 78.
Janet A. Kourany (2010). Philosophy of Science After Feminism. Oxford University Press.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Janet A. Kourany (2003). A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty‐First Century. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
David Stump (1992). Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods. Philosophy of Science 59 (3):456-460.
John Losee (1987). Philosophy of Science and Historical Enquiry. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-09-15
Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,594 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,594 )
How can I increase my downloads?