Topoi 24 (2):221-227 (2005)
|Abstract||Morality is serious yet it needs to be reconciled with the free play of alternatives that characterizes rational and ethical agency. Beginning with a sketch of the seriousness of morality modeled as a constraint, this paper introduces a technical conception of play as degrees of freedom. We consider two ways to apply game theory to ethics, rationalist and evolutionary game theory, contrasting the way they model moral constraint. Freedom in the rationalist account is problematic, subverting willful commitment. In the evolutionary account, freedom is also problematic, leading to an infinity of possible social norms with dubious normative force. While these two approaches complement each other, we argue that the evolutionary approach is superior on both theoretical and practical grounds.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Monique Wonderly (2008). A Humean Approach to Assessing the Moral Significance of Ultra-Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (1):1-10.
By Alan Carter (2003). Morality and Freedom. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):161–180.
Richard Double (2004). The Ethical Advantages of Free Will Subjectivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):411-422.
William C. Pamerleau (2002). Ethical Uncertainty, Nietzschean Freedom, and the Continuing Need for an Existential Perspective. Social Philosophy Today 18:31-43.
B. Verbeek (2002). Game Theory and Moral Norms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):337-352.
Fabio Paglieri (2005). Playing by and with the Rules: Norms and Morality in Play Development. Topoi 24 (2):149-167.
Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105 - 123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,395 of 722,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,786 )
How can I increase my downloads?