David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 55 (2):153 - 178 (2005)
George Rupp's Beyond Existentialism and Zen, in its typological-structural analysis and model of religious pluralism, proffers an alternative to the dominant Kantian models (e.g., by John Hicks and Sarvepalli Radhakrish- nan). The question for Rupp is not which religion is true and how to decide that issue-answered in the Kantian approach in terms of an unknowable Ding an sich that all religions, albeit imperfectly, try to approximate or conceptualize (i.e., God or the Transcendent)-but rather how do religions represent, at least in principle, a structural possibility for salvation or human flourishing, however different and incompatible their distinct prima facie truth claims might be. Although the potential for a radically relativistic model is implicit in Rupp's approach, it is argued here that his Hegelian assumptions lead him to accept relativism only in a provisional ("critical") way; for Rupp, under ideal epistemic conditions (e.g., the Peircian "end of inquiry"), one final conceptualization of ultimate reality will emerge as absolute truth. In the final part of this essay a version of the relativistic model implicit in Rupp's approach is defended against both the Kantian model of Hicks et al. and Rupp's Hegelian-Peircian model, which, it is argued, is incompatible certainly with the spirit of his own typological-structural analysis, if not with the letter. In challenging what Rupp calls the truth of Zen, it is further argued that not only is more than one salvific structural possibility available to us through the different world religions but also that realizing these possibilities is principally a human responsibility, and that the cosmos is quite indifferent to and compatible with several possibilities, from the most destructive to the most conducive to human well-being and flourishing
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel R. Alvarez (2005). Rupp in Perspective: An Examination of Two Topics In. Philosophy East and West 55 (2).
George Rupp (1979). Beyond Existentialism and Zen: Religion in a Pluralistic World. Oxford University Press.
Jeroen van Dongen (2007). The Interpretation of the Einstein-Rupp Experiments and Their Influence on the History of Quantum Mechanics. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37:121-131.
Jeroen van Dongen, Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein and the Canal Ray Experiments on Wave-Particle Duality: Scientific Fraud and Theoretical Bias.
George Rupp (1971). The Relationship Between Nirvāna and Samsāra: An Essay on the Evolution of Buddhist Ethics. Philosophy East and West 21 (1):55-67.
Gordon Rupp, D. D. & D. Théol (1970). The New Counter-Reformation. Heythrop Journal 11 (1):5–16.
B. Rupp-Eisenreich (1997). Culture and Memory Reminiscences and Symmetries. Diogenes 45 (180):135-154.
E. Gordon Rupp (1952). Principalities and Powers. New York, Abingdon-Cokesbury Press.
Leila J. Rupp (1979). Women, Class, and Mobilization in Nazi Germany. Science and Society 43 (1):51 - 69.
Dale Stuart Wright (1998). Philosophical Meditations on Zen Buddhism. Cambridge University Press.
Martin Luther, Desiderius Erasmus, E. Gordon Rupp & Philip S. Watson (eds.) (1969). Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.
Deborah E. Rupp & Chris M. Bell (2010). Extending the Deontic Model of Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (1):89-106.
Richard Bryan McDaniel & Albert Low (eds.) (2012). Zen Masters of China: The First Step East: Zen Stories. Tuttle Publishing.
Jung H. Lee (1998). Problems of Religious Pluralism: A Zen Critique of John Hick's Ontological Monomorphism. Philosophy East and West 48 (3):453-477.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads19 ( #193,932 of 1,796,192 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #349,835 of 1,796,192 )
How can I increase my downloads?