The place of ethics in a unified behavioral science

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):23-24 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Behavioral science, unified in the way Gintis proposes, should affect ethics, which also finds itself in “disarray,” in three ways. First, it raises the standards. Second, it removes the easy targets of economic and sociobiological selfishness. Third, it provides methods, in particular the close coupling of theory and experiments, to construct a better ethics. (Published Online April 27 2007).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Against the unification of the behavioral sciences.Steve Clarke - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Implications for law of a unified behavioral science.Owen D. Jones - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):30-31.
Information processing as one key for a unification?Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):40-40.
The limitations of unification.Arthur B. Markman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):33-34.
Unified Theories and Unified Science.Robert L. Causey - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:3 - 13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#202,650)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references