Why even Kim-style psychophysical laws are impossible
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):225-237 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Epistemology Laws Mental Physical Kim, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAusonio Marras (1993). Psychophysical Supervenience and Nonreductive Materialism. Synthese 95 (2):275-304.
Tim Crane (1991). All God has to Do. Analysis 51 (October):235-44.
Jens Harbecke (2011). Mind in a Humean World. Metaphysica 12 (2):213-229.
Jaegwon Kim (1967). Psychophysical Laws and Theories of Mind. Theoria 33 (3):198-210.
G. Witmer (2003). Multiple Realizability and Psychological Laws: Evaluating Kim's Challenge. In Sven Walter & Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation. Imprint Academic.
Jaegwon Kim (1989). Honderich on Mental Events and Psychoneural Laws. Inquiry 32 (March):29-48.
Jaegwon Kim (1985). Psychophysical Laws. In Brian P. Mclaughlin & Ernest Lepore (eds.), Action and Events. Blackwell.
Jaegwon Kim (1972). Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws and the Identity Theory. The Monist 56 (April):178-92.
Noa Latham (1999). Davidson and Kim on Psychophysical Laws. Synthese 118 (2):121-44.
Alexander Miller (1993). Some Anomalies in Kim's Account of Davidson. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):335-44.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #94,544 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
