Reply to Feldman, Hurka, and Rosati
Philosophical Studies 130 (3) (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFred Feldman (2007). Reply to Elinor Mason and Alastair Norcross. Utilitas 19 (3):398-406.
E. J. Bond (1988). `Good' and `Good For': A Reply to Hurka. Mind 97 (386):279-280.
Thomas Hurka (2006). I–Thomas Hurka. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):217–235.
Connie S. Rosati (2006). Review: Darwall on Welfare and Rational Care. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 130 (3):619 - 635.
John Martin Fischer & Anthony Brueckner (2013). The Evil of Death and the Lucretian Symmetry: A Reply to Feldman. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):783-789.
Thomas Hurka (1984). Rights and Punishment—A Reply to McKerlie. Dialogue 23 (01):141-148.
L. W. Sumner (1989). Reply to Hurka and Copp. Dialogue 28 (01):149-.
Stephen Kershnar (2006). Hurka's Theory of Virtue. Philosophia 34 (2):159-168.
Stephen Darwall (2006). Review: Reply to Feldman, Hurka, and Rosati. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 130 (3):637 - 658.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,618 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,272 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
