David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 162 (2):195 - 223 (2008)
Any advanced theory of physics contains modules defined as essential components that are themselves theories with different domains of application. Different kinds of modules can be distinguished according to the way in which they fit in the symbolic and interpretive apparatus of a theory. The number and kind of the modules of a given theory vary as the theory evolves in time. The relative stability of modules and the variability of their insertion in other theories play a vital role in the application, comparison, construction, and communication of theories. Modularity conveys some global unity to physics through the sharing of modules by diverse theories. This alternative to rigid hierarchies and holistic totalities permits a dynamical, plastic, and symbiotic approach to physical theory.
|Keywords||Structure of physical theories Modules Unity/disunity|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert W. Batterman (2002). The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. Oxford University Press.
Mario Biagioli (1990). The Anthropology of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):183-209.
Jed Z. Buchwald (ed.) (1995). Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Doing Physics. The University of Chicago Press.
J. Buttner, J. Renn & M. Schemmel (2003). Exploring the Limits of Classical Physics: Planck, Einstein, and the Structure of a Scientific Revolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):37-59.
Tian Yu Cao & Silvan S. Schweber (1993). The Conceptual Foundations and the Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory. Synthese 97 (1):33 - 108.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Vickers (2014). Scientific Theory Eliminativism. Erkenntnis 79 (1):111-126.
Similar books and articles
Michael K. Cundall (2006). Rethinking the Divide: Modules and Central Systems. Philosophia 34 (4):379-393.
Mary B. Williams (1980). Similarities and Differences Between Evolutionary Theory and the Theories of Physics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:385 - 396.
Lindley Darden (1982). Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science: Reasoning by Analogy in Theory Construction. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:147 - 165.
John Bolender (2003). The Genealogy of the Moral Modules. Minds and Machines 13 (2):233-255.
Brian J. Scholl & Alan M. Leslie (1999). Modularity, Development and "Theory of Mind". Mind and Language 14 (1):131-153.
Alan M. Leslie & Brian J. Scholl (1999). Modularity, Development and 'Theory of Mind'. Mind and Language 14 (1):131-153.
Stephen Andrew Butterfill (2007). What Are Modules and What is Their Role in Development? Mind and Language 22 (4):450–473.
Roger Villemaire (1992). Theories of Modules Closed Under Direct Products. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):515-521.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #53,677 of 1,102,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,639 of 1,102,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?