David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper traces the shifting contours of double jeopardy in India and how it evolved from procedural criminal law top being a constitutional right. The paper would have in-depth analysis of judicial pronouncements on the limits and boundaries of doctrine of double jeopardy and would try to sensitize readers alien to Indian laws on the variations present in Indian system in this near universal doctrine that a man should not be punished twice for one crime.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. McKie, H. Kuhse, J. Richardson & P. Singer (1996). Double Jeopardy, the Equal Value of Lives and the Veil of Ignorance: A Rejoinder to Harris. Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (4):204-208.
Sara Goering & Annette Dula (2004). Reasonable People, Double Jeopardy, and Justice. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):37 – 39.
P. Singer, J. McKie, H. Kuhse & J. Richardson (1995). Double Jeopardy and the Use of QALYs in Health Care Allocation. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):144-150.
J. Harris (1995). Double Jeopardy and the Veil of Ignorance--A Reply. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (3):151-157.
Lawrence A. Locke (1990). On Leo Katz, Double Jeopardy, and the Blockburger Test. Law and Philosophy 9 (3):295 - 309.
Samuel H. Pillsbury (2001). Review Essay / a Rough Country Guide: Double Jeopardy, Doctrine, and Realism. Criminal Justice Ethics 20 (1):53-65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #188,066 of 1,907,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,819 of 1,907,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?