David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 60 (4):535-540 (2010)
Recently, Jonardan Ganeri reviewed the collaborative translation of the first chapter of Gaṅgeśa's Tattvacintāmaṇi by Stephen H. Phillips and N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya (Ganeri 2007). The review is quite favorable, and we have no desire to dispute his kind words. Ganeri does, however, put forth an argument in opposition to a fundamental line of interpretation given by Phillips and Ramanuja Tatacharya about the nature of pramāṇa, knowledge sources, as understood by Gaṅgeśa and, for that matter, Nyāya tradition. This response is meant to answer the argument and reassert an understanding of pramāṇa as factive, that is, as knowledge sources that are inerrant. We argue that this is the best reading of Gaṅgeśa himself ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jennifer Nagel (2013). Defending the Evidential Value of Epistemic Intuitions: A Reply to Stich. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):179-199.
Similar books and articles
Matthew Dasti Stephen H. Phillips (2010). Pramāṇa Are Factive —: A Response to Jonardon Ganeri. Philosophy East and West 60 (4):535-540.
Jonardon Ganeri (2010). The Study of Indian Epistemology: Questions of Method—a Reply to Matthew Dasti and Stephen H. Phillips. Philosophy East and West 60 (4):541-550.
Jonardon Ganeri (2012). The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, and the First-Person Stance. Oxford University Press.
Jonardon Ganeri (1999). Semantic Powers: Meaning and the Means of Knowing in Classical Indian Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Stephen H. Phillips (2001). Semantic Powers: Meaning and the Means of Knowing in Classical Indian Philosophy. Jonardon Ganeri. Mind 110 (439):749-753.
Jonardon Ganeri (2006). Artha =. Oxford University Press.
Jonardon Ganeri (2006). Words That Burn: Why Did the Buddha Say What He Did? Contemporary Buddhism 7 (1):7-27.
Jonardon Ganeri (2004). An Irrealist Theory of Self. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):60-79.
Jonardon Ganeri (1996). ??K??A? And Other Names. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 (4):339-362.
Jonardon Ganeri (1996). “Ākāśa” and Other Names. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 (4):339-362.
Jonardon Ganeri (2002). Why Truth? Thesnake Sūtra. Contemporary Buddhism 3 (2):127-139.
Panayiota Vassilopoulou & Jonardon Ganeri (2005). Convivium Report. Philosophy Now 50:36-39.
Jonardon Ganeri (2005). Traditions of Truth – Changing Beliefs and the Nature of Inquiry. Journal of Indian Philosophy 33 (1):43-54.
Jonardon Ganeri (2004). An Irrealist Theory of Self. Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):61-80.
Added to index2010-10-27
Total downloads20 ( #81,893 of 1,096,906 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #40,366 of 1,096,906 )
How can I increase my downloads?