Reply to Putnam and Walsh
Economics and Philosophy 23 (3):365-372 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTimothy Chambers (2000). A Quick Reply to Putnam's Paradox. Mind 109 (434):195-197.
Hilary Putnam (1994). Comments and Replies. In Peter Clark & Bob Hale (eds.), Reading Putnam. Blackwell.
Hilary Putnam (1982). Reply to Two Realists. Journal of Philosophy 79 (10):575-577.
Stuart Hampshire & Sidney Morgenbesser (1963). Reply to Walsh on Thought and Action. Journal of Philosophy 60 (14):410-424.
Timothy Bays (2007). More on Putnam's Models: A Reply to Belloti. Erkenntnis 67 (1):119--35.
Mathias Frisch (1999). Van Fraassen's Dissolution of Putnam's Model-Theoretic Argument. Philosophy of Science 66 (1):158-164.
Noam A. Chomsky (1969). Linguistics and Philosophy. In Sidney Hook (ed.), Language and Philosophy. New York University Press.
Jaime Nubiola (2008). Dichotomies and Artifacts: A Reply to Professor Hookway. In Rivas Monroy , Cancela Silva & MartÃnez Vidal (eds.), Following Putnam's Trail: On Realism and Other Issues.
Hilary Putnam & Vivian Walsh (2007). A Response to Dasgupta. Economics and Philosophy 23 (3):359-364.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,151 of 549,108 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,108 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
