Graduate studies at Western
Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):165-178 (2011)
|Abstract||I would like to show how with Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas, we have to do with three different ways of understanding the experience of the other. For Sartre it is a visual experience, the experience of being looked at by the other, so that the experience of the other is understood as a confrontation; for Merleau-Ponty, the experience of the other necessarily implies coexistence and what he calls intercorporeality, so that for him the other is never to be found in front, but instead beside me, in reciprocity with me; for Levinas, the experience of the other is the experience of a non-reciprocity, of an assymetrical relation, because the experience of the other is for him an ethical and not an ontological experience, and because this experience of the face of the other is the experience of a speaking and not in the first place corporeal presence. There are consequently three different ways of finding an access to the other : the look for Sartre, intercorporeality for Merleau-Ponty and the face for Levinas|
|Keywords||Sartre Merleau-Ponty Levinas The other The face Intercorporeality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jan Bengtsson (2013). Embodied Experience in Educational Practice and Research. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32 (1):39-53.
Jonathan Webber (2011). Freedom. In Sebastian Luft & Søren Overgaard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology. Routledge.
Taylor Carman (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the Mystery of Perception. Philosophy Compass 4 (4):630-638.
Trevor Perri (2013). Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
John M. Moreland (1973). For-Itself and in-Itself in Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 17:311-318.
David Michael Levin (2009). Experience and Description in the Moral Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. In Robert Vallier, Wayne Jeffrey Froman & Bernard Flynn (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. State University of New York Press.
Silvia Stoller (2009). Phenomenology and the Poststructural Critique of Experience. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):707-737.
Ron McClamrock (2013). Visual Consciousness and The Phenomenology of Perception. Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):63-68.
Sara Heinämaa (1999). Merleau-Ponty's Modification of Phenomenology: Cognition, Passion and Philosophy. Synthese 118 (1):49-68.
David Morris (2007). Phenomenological Realism and the Moving Image of Experience. Dialogue 46 (03):569-582.
Marie-Eve Morin (2010). Thinking Things: Heidegger, Sartre, Nancy. Sartre Studies International 15 (2):35-53.
Raphaël Gély (2009). L'imaginaire et l'aff ectivité originaire de la perception. Studia Phaenomenologica 9:173-192.
Leonard Lawlor (2005). Un Ecart Infime (Part I): Foucault's Critique of the Concept of Lived-Experience ( Vécu). Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):11-28.
Christinia Ryan Landry, A Phenomenological Account of Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Style : From Embodiment to Flesh.
David Abram (1988). Merleau-Ponty and the Voice of the Earth. Environmental Ethics 10 (2):101-120.
Added to index2011-05-04
Total downloads103 ( #7,476 of 752,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,163 of 752,081 )
How can I increase my downloads?