David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (3):602-610 (2012)
In their theoretical and experimental reflections on the capacities and behaviours of living systems, neuroscientists often formulate generalizations about the behaviour of neural circuits. These generalizations are highly idealized, as they omit reference to the myriads of conditions that could perturb the behaviour of the modelled system in real-world settings. This article analyses an experimental investigation of the behaviour of place cells in the rat hippocampus, in which highly idealized generalizations were tested by comparing predictions flowing from them with real-world experimental results. The aim of the article is to identify under what conditions even single prediction failures regarding the behaviour of single cells sufficed to reject highly idealized generalizations, and under what conditions prima facie counter-examples were deemed to be irrelevant to the testing of highly idealized generalizations. The results of this analysis may contribute to understanding how idealized models are tested experimentally in neuroscience and used to make reliable predictions concerning living systems in real-world settings
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ronald N. Giere (2004). How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742-752.
James Woodward (2000). Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):197-254.
Stuart Glennan (2005). Modeling Mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (2):443-464.
Paul M. Pietroski & Georges Rey (1995). When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws From Vacuity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1):81-110.
John Earman, John T. Roberts & Sheldon Smith (2002). Ceteris Paribus Lost. Erkenntnis 57 (3):281-301.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Kowalenko (2014). Ceteris Paribus Laws: A Naturalistic Account. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):133-155.
Similar books and articles
Jacqueline Anne Sullivan (2009). The Multiplicity of Experimental Protocols: A Challenge to Reductionist and Non-Reductionist Models of the Unity of Neuroscience. Synthese 167 (3):511-539.
Jeffry L. Ramsey (2007). Calibrating and Constructing Models of Protein Folding. Synthese 155 (3):307 - 320.
Neil Tennant (2010). The Logical Structure of Scientific Explanation and Prediction: Planetary Orbits in a Sun's Gravitational Field. Studia Logica 95 (1/2):207 - 232.
Darrell P. Rowbottom & R. McNeill Alexander (2012). The Role of Hypotheses in Biomechanical Research. Science in Context 25 (2):247-262.
Arjen Hommersom, John-jules Meyer & Erik De vink (2004). Update Semantics of Security Protocols. Synthese 142 (2):229 - 267.
Lawrence Weiskrantz (1986). Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford University Press.
Janet D. Stemwedel (2006). Getting More with Less: Experimental Constraints and Stringent Tests of Model Mechanisms of Chemical Oscillators. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):743-754.
M. Chirimuuta (2013). Extending, Changing, and Explaining the Brain. Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):613-638.
Stephen D. O'Leary (1997). Apocalyptic Argument and the Anticipation of Catastrophe: The Prediction of Risk and the Risks of Prediction. [REVIEW] Argumentation 11 (3):293-313.
David Danks (2005). Scientific Coherence and the Fusion of Experimental Results. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):791-807.
M. Farisco & C. Petrini (2012). The Impact of Neuroscience and Genetics on the Law: A Recent Italian Case. Neuroethics 5 (3):317-319.
Raquel Fernández & Ulle Endriss (2007). Abstract Models for Dialogue Protocols. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):121-140.
Dingmar Van Eck, Huib Looren De Jong & Maurice K. D. Schouten (2006). Evaluating New Wave Reductionism: The Case of Vision. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):167-196.
Dan Lloyd (1994). Connectionist Hysteria: Reducing a Freudian Case Study to a Network Model. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1 (2):69-88.
Added to index2012-06-08
Total downloads7 ( #440,687 of 1,911,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,010 of 1,911,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?