Husserl's Phenomenological Justification of Universal Rigorous Science

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,350
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Edmund Husserl (2002). Philosophy as Rigorous Science. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 2:249-295.
Shojiro Kotegawa (2008). Epoché and Teleology. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 19:41-48.
Andrzej Klawiter (2004). Why Did Husserl Not Become the Galileo of the Science of Consciousness? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):253-271.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (3):467-471.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

7 ( #180,440 of 1,096,760 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,760 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.