Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):379 - 397 (1996)
|Abstract||A source of much difficulty and confusion in the interpretation of quantum mechanics is a naive realism about operators. By this we refer to various ways of taking too seriously the notion of operator-as-observable, and in particular to the all too casual talk about measuring operators that occurs when the subject is quantum mechanics. Without a specification of what should be meant by measuring a quantum observable, such an expression can have no clear meaning. A definite specification is provided by Bohmian mechanics, a theory that emerges from Schrödinger's equation for a system of particles when we merely insist that particles means particles. Bohmian mechanics clarifies the status and the role of operators as observables in quantum mechanics by providing the operational details absent from standard quantum mechanics. It thereby allows us to readily dismiss all the radical claims traditionally enveloping the transition from the classical to the quantum realm — for example, that we must abandon classical logic or classical probability. The moral is rather simple: Beware naive realism, especially about operators!|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Kosso (2000). Quantum Mechanics and Realism. Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.
D. Durr, S. Goldstein & N. Zanghi (1995). Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 26 (2):137-149.
Scott Tanona (2004). Idealization and Formalism in Bohr's Approach to Quantum Theory. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):683-695.
Sheldon Goldstein, Bohmian Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adrian Heathcote (1990). Unbounded Operators and the Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 57 (3):523-534.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?