A consideration of the normative status of skill in the purposive sports
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):22 – 32 (2007)
| Abstract | It is popularly believed within sport's practice communities that a contest fails if the competitor who performs most skilfully in it does not win. The belief is rarely acknowledged explicitly, and therefore deserves to be considered ideological in a sense. In this paper I challenge that belief. For conceptual reasons, I confine the discussion to the purposive sports, e.g. football and tennis. The concept of skill is approached by articulation of a set of platitudes about skill in the purposive sports. The first is the conceptual wedge between skill and success. The second is the distinction between skill and other performance-relevant qualities such as courage, strength and luck. The third is the fact that skill deficits can be compensated by sufficient amounts of the other performance relevant qualities. The fourth is the dispositional and dynamic character of skill. The relation between skill and final objectives in the purposive sports means that (i) qualities such as nerve and courage can trump the more skilful performance; and (ii) poor execution of a narrow range of skills can result in the competitive failure of the more skilful performance. There is no viable ideal of sport that would ground regret about the realisation of the immediately preceding possibilities. The inclination towards such regret might be partly motivated by the wish to take a gratifying view of ourselves. An end to this response, and a more inclusive, less hierarchical conception of sport skills, is worth recommending | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Mumford (2011). Watching Sport: Aesthetics, Ethics and Emotion for the Spectator. Routledge.
Dietrich Stout (2002). Thinking and Doing in Cognitive Archaeology: Giving Skill its Due. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):421-422.
Øyvind F. Standal & Vegard F. Moe (2011). Merleau-Ponty Meets Kretchmar: Sweet Tensions of Embodied Learning. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):256 - 269.
Yotam Lurie (2002). The Ontology of Sports Injuries. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):265-276.
John Sutton (2007). Batting, Habit, and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. Sport in Society 10 (5):763-786.
Keith Stenning & Padraic Monaghan (2000). Cooperative Versus Adversarial Communication; Contextual Embedding Versus Disengagement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):696-697.
Matthew Stichter (2007). The Skill of Virtue. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):39-49.
Thomas Nadelhoffer (2005). Skill, Luck, Control, and Intentional Action. Philosophical Psychology 18 (3):341 – 352.
Matt Stichter (2007). Ethical Expertise: The Skill Model of Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):183 - 194.
Jørgen W. Eriksen (2010). Mindless Coping in Competitive Sport: Some Implications and Consequences. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (1):66 – 86.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,518 of 549,744 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,744 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
