David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environment, Space, Place 1 (2):103-129 (2009)
The intent of my article is to examine critically the peculiar “forbidden” significance entailed in places designated as the commons. The commons are those places within a particular environment or ecosystem that serve as the essential life-giving resource for its members. Due to both changes in the earth’s climate and the over consumption of resources, the commons are in a state of desperate crisis throughout much of the world. A symptom of this crisis is the rising political and environmental violence specific to those places that harbor the commons. One strategy employed to address the political crisis is the privatization of these life-giving resources. The justification for privatization rests on providing the economic support necessary to secure and gain greater access to the commons. There has been as a result a growing effort from both a human right and environmental standpoint to articulate a global provision that would protect the commons from the industries of privatization and commodification.In this article, I bolster these efforts by specifying the manner by which the commons resist privatization. My focus is on the type of place, or rather, the type of forbidden place the commons are. The commons do not resist by forbidding use or occupation. Quite to the contrary, they resist by giving life, by welcoming all who may sustain themselves through them. Their place is a place for no one precisely because it is a place for all
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lucas Haley Commons-Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Geoffrey David Commons (2008). Genetic Engineering and the Speciation of Superions From Humans. World Futures 64 (5):436-443.
Craig P. Dunn (1996). Collaborative Control and The Commons. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3):277-288.
John Vandermeer (1996). Tragedy of the Commons: The Meaning of the Metaphor. Science and Society 60 (3):290 - 306.
Amy Motichek, Walter Block & Jay Johnson (2008). Forget Ocean Front Property, We Want Ocean Real Estate! Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (2):147 – 155.
Susan Jane Buck Cox (1985). No Tragedy of the Commons. Environmental Ethics 7 (1):49-61.
Margaret Gilbert (1999). Annette Baier, The Commons of the Mind:The Commons of the Mind. Ethics 109 (4):894-897.
Rebecca Martusewicz (2005). Eros in the Commons: Educating for Eco-Ethical Consciousness in a Poetics of Place. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):331 – 348.
Megan Blomfield (2013). Global Common Resources and the Just Distribution of Emission Shares. Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (3):283-304.
Walter Block (2011). Review of Ostrom's Governing the Commons. [REVIEW] Libertarian Papers 3.
Herman T. Tavani (2005). Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.
Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi (2004). The Tragedy of the Digital Commons. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
Edwin M. Hartman (1994). The Commons and the Moral Organization. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (3):253-269.
Rob Anderson & Robert Dardenne (1996). The American Newspaper as the Public Conversational Commons. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (3):159 – 165.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads4 ( #289,612 of 1,410,533 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,533 )
How can I increase my downloads?