David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):395-414 (2008)
There has been relatively little empirical research into the causes of research misconduct. To begin to address this void, the authors collected data from closed case files of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI). These data were in the form of statements extracted from ORI file documents including transcripts, investigative reports, witness statements, and correspondence. Researchers assigned these statements to 44 different concepts. These concepts were then analyzed using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The authors chose a solution consisting of seven clusters: (1) personal and professional stressors, (2) organizational climate, (3) job insecurities, (4) rationalizations A, (5) personal inhibitions, (6) rationalizations B and, (7) personality factors. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for policy and for future research.
|Keywords||Research integrity Research misconduct Responsible conduct of research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tom Jefferson (1998). Redundant Publication in Biomedical Sciences: Scientific Misconduct or Necessity? [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):135-140.
C. Whitbeck (1995). Truth and Trustworthiness in Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):403-416.
Anne Hudson Jones (2003). Can Authorship Policies Help Prevent Scientific Misconduct? What Role for Scientific Societies? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):243-256.
Stephan Fuchs & S. D. Westervelt (1996). Fraud and Trust in Science. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 39 (2):248.
Peter Jay (1999). Research Misconduct—Have We Reached the Turning Point at Last? Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):119-122.
Citations of this work BETA
James M. DuBois, John T. Chibnall & John Gibbs (forthcoming). Compliance Disengagement in Research: Development and Validation of a New Measure. Science and Engineering Ethics.
James M. DuBois, Emily E. Anderson, Kelly Carroll, Tyler Gibb, Elena Kraus, Timothy Rubbelke & Meghan Vasher (2011). Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases. Ethics and Behavior 22 (3):163 - 188.
Philip J. Langlais & Blake J. Bent (2014). Individual and Organizational Predictors of the Ethicality of Graduate Students’ Responses to Research Integrity Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):897-921.
Patrick I. Okonta & Theresa Rossouw (2014). Misconduct in Research: A Descriptive Survey of Attitudes, Perceptions and Associated Factors in a Developing Country. BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):25.
Ann Peiffer, Christina Hugenschmidt & Paul Laurienti (2011). Ethics in 15 Min Per Week. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):289-297.
Similar books and articles
Péter Kakuk (2009). The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):545-562.
Debra Parrish & Bridget Noonan (2009). Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):161-167.
Samuel Tilden (2010). Incarceration, Restitution, and Lifetime Debarment: Legal Consequences of Scientific Misconduct in the Eric Poehlman Case. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):737-741.
John E. Dahlberg & Christian C. Mahler (2006). The Poehlman Case: Running Away From the Truth. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):157-173.
Barbara Mishkin (1999). Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Chris B. Pascal (1999). The History and Future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):183-198.
Barbara K. Redman, Thomas N. Templin & Jon F. Merz (2006). Research Misconduct Among Clinical Trial Staff. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):481-489.
John E. Dahlberg & Nancy M. Davidian (2010). Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity Can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):713-735.
E. Wright David, L. Titus Sandra & B. Cornelison Jered (2008). MentOring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research mentOring in Closed Ori Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3).
David E. Wright, Sandra L. Titus & Jered B. Cornelison (2008). Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed Ori Cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):323-336.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #97,172 of 1,725,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #41,986 of 1,725,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?