David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (December):541-55 (1989)
In this paper, I define tacit knowledge as a kind of causal-explanatory structure, mirroring the derivational structure in the theory that is tacitly known. On this definition, tacit knowledge does not have to be explicitly represented. I then take the notion of a modular theory, and project the idea of modularity to several different levels of description: in particular, to the processing level and the neurophysiological level. The fundamental description of a connectionist network lies at a level between the processing level and the physiological level. At this level, connectionism involves a characteristic departure from modularity, and a correlative absence of syntactic structure. This is linked to the fact that tacit knowledge descriptions of networks are only approximately true. A consequence is that strict causal systematicity in cognitive processes poses a problem for the connectionist programme
|Keywords||Connectionism Language Modularity Syntax Tacit Knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Crimmins (1992). Tacitness and Virtual Beliefs. Mind and Language 7 (3):240-63.
Luigi Burigana & Michele Vicovaro (forthcoming). Modules in Spatial Vision: Intrinsic Reasons of Their Functional Attributes. Philosophical Psychology:1-11.
Similar books and articles
Walter van Herck (1999). The Role Of Tacit Knowledge In Religion. Tradition and Discovery 26 (2):21-30.
Jonathan Perraton & Iona Tarrant (2007). What Does Tacit Knowledge Actually Explain? Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (3):353-370.
Charles Lowney (2011). Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Yu Zhenhua (2003). Tacit Knowledge/Knowing and the Problem of Articulation. Tradition and Discovery 30 (2):11-23.
Stephen G. Henry (2011). A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
B. Chandrasekaran, A. Goel & D. Allemang (1988). Connectionism and Information-Processing Abstractions. AI Magazine 24.
Andrea Pozzali (2007). Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Andy Clark (1990). Connectionism, Competence and Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (June):195-222.
Jon Cogburn (2004). Inferentialism and Tacit Knowledge. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):503 - 524.
Harry Collins (2011). Analysing Tacit Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):38-42.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads178 ( #10,997 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)116 ( #7,905 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?