Computationalism: Still the Only Game in Town [Book Review]
Minds and Machines 22 (3):183-190 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract Mental representations, Swiatczak (Minds Mach 21:19–32, 2011) argues, are fundamentally biochemical and their operations depend on consciousness; hence the computational theory of mind, based as it is on multiple realisability and purely syntactic operations, must be wrong. Swiatczak, however, is mistaken. Computation, properly understood, can afford descriptions/explanations of any physical process, and since Swiatczak accepts that consciousness has a physical basis, his argument against computationalism must fail. Of course, we may not have much idea how consciousness (itself a rather unclear plurality of notions) might be implemented, but we do have a hypothesis—that all of our mental life, including consciousness, is the result of computational processes and so not tied to a biochemical substrate. Like it or not, the computational theory of mind remains the only game in town. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-8 DOI 10.1007/s11023-012-9271-5 Authors David Davenport, Computer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey Journal Minds and Machines Online ISSN 1572-8641 Print ISSN 0924-6495|
|Keywords||Computational theory of mind Computationalism Consciousness Computation Mental representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bartlomiej Swiatczak (2011). Conscious Representations: An Intractable Problem for the Computational Theory of Mind. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 21 (1):19-32.
Luciano Floridi (2011). The Construction of Personal Identities Online. Minds and Machines 21 (4):477-479.
Lorenzo Magnani (2012). L. Albertazzi, G. J. Van Tonder, and D. Vishwanath (Eds): Perception Beyond Inference: The Information Content of Visual Processes. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (1):53-55.
Juan Felipe Martinez Florez (2012). Dietmar Heinke and Eirini Mavritsaki (Eds): Computational Modelling in Behavioural Neuroscience. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (1):57-60.
David Longinotti (2009). Computationalism and the Locality Principle. Minds and Machines 19 (4):495-506.
Sebastian Sequoiah-Grayson (2012). Giovanni Sommaruga (Ed): Formal Theories of Information: From Shannon to Semantic Information Theory and General Concepts of Information. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (1):35-40.
David Cole (2009). Jerry Fodor, Lot 2: The Language of Thought Revisited , New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, X+228, $37.95, Isbn 978-0-119-954877-. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (3):439-443.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2004). Functionalism, Computationalism, & Mental States. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):811-833.
Giuseppe Primiero (2011). Giovanni Sommaruga (Ed): Formal Theories of Information: From Shannon to Semantic Information Theory and General Concepts of Information. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 21 (1):119-122.
Cameron Shelley (2012). Lorenzo Magnani: Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (3):263-269.
Matthew Stuart Piper (2012). You Can't Eat Causal Cake with an Abstract Fork: An Argument Against Computational Theories of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (11-12):154-90.
Ramesh Kumar Mishra (2012). Haluk Ogmen and Bruno G. Breitmeyer (Eds.): The First Half Second: The Microgenesis and Temporal Dynamics of Unconscious and Conscious Visual Processes. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 22 (1):61-65.
Erhan Demircioglu (2012). Christopher Hill: Consciousness. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 77 (1):149-154.
Marcin Miłkowski (2007). Is Computationalism Trivial? In Gordana Dodig Crnkovic & Susan Stuart (eds.), Computation, Information, Cognition: The Nexus and the Liminal. Cambridge Scholars Press.
Added to index2012-02-18
Total downloads42 ( #31,682 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?