Philosophy and Literature 33 (2):315-328 (2009)
|Abstract||Arthur C. Danto taught that an artwork’s identity and content depend on "an atmosphere of theory the eye cannot de[s]cry" (1964:580). By "theory", he did not mean the ideas developed by philosophers of art. His point was that an artwork can be properly recognized and appreciated only when seen in relation to the heritage of works, writings, practices, genres, and conventions that form the ground on which it stands out as subject. In brief, the work must be seen against the backdrop of what he dubbed (1964) the art world.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Katherine Thomson (2002). Aesthetic and Ethical Mediocrity in Art. Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215.
Arthur Coleman Danto (1998). The Wake of Art: Essays: Criticism, Philosophy and the Ends of Taste. G+B Arts Int'l.
Andrea Rehberg (2009). The World and the Work of Art. Epoché 14 (1):131-142.
Božidar Kante (2005). Contextualism, Art, and Rigidity: Levinson, Currie and Davies. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 20 (4):53-63.
K. Stock (2000). Some Objections to Stecker's Historical Functionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):479-491.
John Dilworth (2005). The Double Content of Art. Prometheus Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,518 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?