David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Literature 33 (2):315-328 (2009)
Arthur C. Danto taught that an artwork’s identity and content depend on "an atmosphere of theory the eye cannot de[s]cry" (1964:580). By "theory", he did not mean the ideas developed by philosophers of art. His point was that an artwork can be properly recognized and appreciated only when seen in relation to the heritage of works, writings, practices, genres, and conventions that form the ground on which it stands out as subject. In brief, the work must be seen against the backdrop of what he dubbed (1964) the art world.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Katherine Thomson (2002). Aesthetic and Ethical Mediocrity in Art. Philosophical Papers 31 (2):199-215.
Arthur Coleman Danto (1998). The Wake of Art: Essays: Criticism, Philosophy and the Ends of Taste. G+B Arts Int'l.
Andrea Rehberg (2009). The World and the Work of Art. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):131-142.
Božidar Kante (2005). Contextualism, Art, and Rigidity: Levinson, Currie and Davies. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 20 (4):53-63.
K. Stock (2000). Some Objections to Stecker's Historical Functionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):479-491.
John Dilworth (2005). The Double Content of Art. Prometheus Books.
Robert J. Yanal (2010). Duchamp And Kant: Together at Last. Angelaki 7 (1):161-167.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #29,026 of 1,724,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)78 ( #11,157 of 1,724,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?