Divine Omniscience and Human Freedom: STEPHEN T. DAVIS

Religious Studies 15 (3):303-316 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theists typically believe the following two propositions: God is omniscient, and Human beings are free. Are they consistent? In order to decide, we must first ask what they mean. Roughly, let us say that a being is omniscient if for any proposition he knows whether it is true or false. Since I have no wish to deny that there are true and false propositions about future states of affairs , omniscience includes foreknowledge, which we can say is knowledge of the truth value of propositions about future states of affairs. For example, I believe the proposition ‘Davis will wear shoes tomorrow’ is true today, and if it is true today, i.e. if I will wear shoes tomorrow, an omniscient being knows today that it is true – and, if this being is eternally omniscient, he knew it millions of years ago

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Omniscience and experience.Marcel Sarot - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (2):89 - 102.
Reconciling Omniscience and Freedom: Ockhamist and Molinist Strategies.Mark Daniel Linville - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Divine Omniscience and Human Freedom.Stephen T. Davis - 1979 - Religious Studies 15 (3):303 - 316.
Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham.Michael J. Cholbi - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
The Eternal Existence of True Propositions.Mark Steven Roberts - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Dallas
values As A Political Metaframe.James Roper - 2007 - Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):51-77.
Is omniscience impossible?Rik Peels - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):481-490.
Omniscience and the Identification Problem.Robert Bass - 2007 - Florida Philosophical Review 7 (1):78-91.
Conditionals of Freedom as Bivalent: A Defense of Middle Knowledge.Dean Allan Kowalski - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Divine Foreknowledge and Necessity.In-kyu Song - 1996 - Dissertation, Syracuse University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
50 (#311,236)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references