Examples as method? My attempts to understand assessment and fairness (in the spirit of the later wittgenstein)
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (3):371-389 (2009)
What is 'fairness' in the context of educational assessment? I apply this question to a number of contemporary educational assessment practices and policies. My approach to philosophy of education owes much to Wittgenstein. A commentary set apart from the main body of the paper focuses on my style of philosophising. Wittgenstein teaches us to examine in depth the fine-grained complexities of social phenomena and to refrain from imposing abstract theory on a recalcitrant reality. I write philosophy of education for policy makers and teachers. Scrutiny of examples plays a vital role in communicating with such an audience. Starting points include 'accommodations' for disabled students, allegedly gender-biased tests, and the recruitment procedures of 'elitist' music conservatoires. A key intuition that fairness is associated with test validity turns out to be seriously flawed. Problems centre on the idea of a 'construct', and the supposed divide between an underlying construct and its behavioural manifestations. Equality of opportunity notions underlie some accusations of unfairness but there are alternative approaches to a just society. Both the judgments about fairness, and the proposed remedies are open to serious philosophical criticisms. There are widespread conceptual difficulties, together with inconsistent and contestable value judgments.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Locke (1690/1970). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 1690. Menston,Scolar Press.
Thomas Nagel (2003). 1 Rawls and Liberalism. In Samuel Richard Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press. 62.
John Rawls (2009/2005). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. 133-135.
John Rawls (1971/2005). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cameron Shelley (2012). Fairness in Technological Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):663-680.
Jeff Stickney (2010). Reconciling Forms of Asian Humility with Assessment Practices and Character Education Programs in North America. Ethics and Education 5 (1):67-80.
David LaRocca (2007). Changing the Subject: The Auto/Biographical as the Philosophical in Wittgenstein. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):169-184.
Erich Ammereller & Eugen Fisher (eds.) (2004). Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge.
T. Phillips (2011). From the Ideal Market to the Ideal Clinic: Constructing a Normative Standard of Fairness for Human Subjects Research. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):79-106.
Gordon Stobart (2001). The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.
Christian Arnsperger & Philippe De Villé (2004). Can Competition Ever Be Fair? Challenging the Standard Prejudice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (4):433 - 451.
Ben Saunders (2010). Fairness Between Competing Claims. Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
M. S. Singer (1996). The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4):469 - 474.
Brad Hooker (2005). Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Added to index2009-07-21
Total downloads22 ( #90,363 of 1,679,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,003 of 1,679,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?