Ecosophy: The seduction of Sophia?
Environmental Ethics 8 (2):151-162 (1986)
| Abstract | In this paper I challenge the reader to witness the environmental and feminist aegis as an epicine confrontation with nature whose main goal is to reconcile a lost partnership with the archetype I have labeled Sophia. Sophia, whose providential origins lie somewhere amid the great pre-Hellenic gnostic cults, can only bring salvation if she is liberated by humanity through the resacralization of nature. It is this change in consciousness that points toward a radical environnlental ethic and a total reconceptualization of the becoming process | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHugh J. McCann (2013). Divine Nature and Divine Will. Sophia 52 (1):77-94.
Knut A. Jacobsen (1996). Bhagavadgīt , Ecosophy T, and Deep Ecology. Inquiry 39 (2):219 – 238.
Christopher P. Long (2002). The Ontological Reappropriation of Phronēsis. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (1):35-60.
Michael Veber (2009). Reply on Behalf of Joe. Sophia 48 (4).
Herner Sæverot (2011). Kierkegaard, Seduction, and Existential Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (6):557-572.
Deane Curtin (1996). A State of Mind Like Water: Ecosophy T and the Buddhist Traditions. Inquiry 39 (2):239 – 253.
Nick Trakakis (2009). Sophia Editorial. Sophia 48 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,628 of 549,196 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,196 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
