David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Axiomathes 13 (3-4):303-327 (2003)
Inverting a face impairs perception of its features and recognition of its identity. Whether faces are special in this regard is a current topic of research and debate. Kanizsa studied the role of facial features and environmental context in perceiving the emotion and identity of upright and inverted faces. He found that observers are biased to interpret faces in a retinal coordinate frame, and that this bias is readily overruled by increased realism of facial features, but not easily overruled by environmental context. An additional factor contributing to a retinal coordinate-frame interpretation may be the ambiguous nature of the face stimuli. Since his facial expressions are interpretable both upright and inverted, they may in both orientations activate an endogenous attentional process for faces. We present visual search and change-blindness experiments that explore how inversion, negation, and facial emotion affect visual attention to static faces. We find that attention to faces is impaired by inversion and negation. We also find that the parts of the face that receive greater attention can be influenced by the emotional expression of the face. We propose to extend these experiments to dynamic faces. To this end, we develop a theory of the visual representation of dynamic faces, in which faces are represented by classes of `spacetime fragments'-moving regions of the face with high informational content. We then present ideas for future experiments which are motivated by the spacetime fragment theory, and which should serve to constrain its further development.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Logic Ontology Linguistics Cognitive Psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Suslow, Patricia Ohrmann, Jochen Bauer, Astrid V. Rauch, Wolfram Schwindt, Volker Arolt, Walter Heindel & Harald Kugel (2006). Amygdala Activation During Masked Presentation of Emotional Faces Predicts Conscious Detection of Threat-Related Faces. Brain and Cognition 61 (3):243-248.
S. E. Black, Impaired Recognition of Negative Facial Emotions in Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia.
Temre N. Davies & Donald D. Hoffman (2002). Psychophysical Studies of Expressions of Pain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):458-459.
Maarten Milders, Arash Sahraie, Sarah Logan & Niamh Donnellon (2006). Awareness of Faces is Modulated by Their Emotional Meaning. Emotion 6 (1):10-17.
Susan Bredlau (2011). Monstrous Faces and a World Transformed: Merleau-Ponty, Dolezal, and the Enactive Approach on Vision Without Inversion of the Retinal Image. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):481-498.
Anna Stone & Tim Valentine (2007). Angry and Happy Faces Perceived Without Awareness: A Comparison with the Affective Impact of Masked Famous Faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (2):161-186.
Therese Davis (2004). The Face on the Screen: Death, Recognition and Spectatorship. Intellect Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #264,713 of 1,696,653 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #115,625 of 1,696,653 )
How can I increase my downloads?