Graduate studies at Western
History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221 (2000)
|Abstract||The taxonomy and analysis of fallacies in Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations pre-date the formal logic of his Prior Analytics A4-6. Of the 64 fully described examples of ?sophistical refutations? which are fallacious because they are only apparently valid, 49 have the wrong number of premisses or the wrong form of premiss or conclusion for analysis by the Prior Analytics theory of the categorical syllogism. The rest Aristotle either frames so that they do not look like categorical syllogisms or analyses in a quite different way than by categorical syllogistic|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frances Howard-Snyder (2012). The Power of Logic. Mcgraw-Hill.
Katerina Ierodiakonou (2002). Aristotle's Use of Examples in the "Prior Analytics". Phronesis 47 (2):127 - 152.
George Boger (1998). Completion, Reduction and Analysis: Three Proof-Theoretic Processes in Aristotle'sprior Analytics. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):187-226.
Christopher W. Tindale (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Scott G. Schreiber (2003). Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and the World in the Sophistical Refutations. State University of New York Press.
David Botting (2012). What is a Sophistical Refutation? Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Paolo Crivelli & David Charles (2011). In Aristotles Prior Analytics. Phronesis 56 (3):193-203.
Gisela Striker (2009). Aristotle's Prior Analytics Book I: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. OUP Oxford.
David Botting (2012). Fallacies of Accident. Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads22 ( #62,735 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?