David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 160 (3):313 - 333 (2008)
It is argued that Husserl was an “externalist” in at least one sense. For it is argued that Husserl held that genuinely perceptual experiences—that is to say, experiences that are of some real object in the world—differ intrinsically, essentially and as a kind from any hallucinatory experiences. There is, therefore, no neutral “content” that such perceptual experiences share with hallucinations, differing from them only over whether some additional non-psychological condition holds or not. In short, it is argued that Husserl was a “disjunctivist”. In addition, it is argued that Husserl held that the individual object of any experience, perceptual or hallucinatory, is essential to and partly constitutive of that experience. The argument focuses on three aspects of Husserl’s thought: his account of intentional objects, his notion of horizon, and his account of reality
|Keywords||Husserl Externalism Disjunctivism Reality Horizon Intentionality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Tyler Burge (1986). Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception. In Philip Pettit & John McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought, And Context. Clarendon Press
Tyler Burge (1979). Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):73-122.
Tyler Burge (1982). Other Bodies. In Andrew Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object. Oxford University Press
Martin Davies (1992). Perceptual Content and Local Supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 66:21-45.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Dan Zahavi (2008). Internalism, Externalism, and Transcendental Idealism. Synthese 160 (3):355 - 374.
Søren Overgaard (2013). Motivating Disjunctivism. Husserl Studies 29 (1):51-63.
Walter Hopp (2013). No Such Look: Problems with the Dual Content Theory. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (4):813-833.
Claude Romano (2012). Must Phenomenology Remain Cartesian? Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):425-445.
Lilian Alweiss (2009). The Bifurcated Subject. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (3):415 - 434.
Similar books and articles
Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
Michael Shim (2011). Representationalism and Husserlian Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 27 (3):197-215.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Barry Smith (1986). Ontologische Aspekte der Husserlschen Phänomenologie. Husserl Studies 3 (2):115-130.
Grant Gillett (1997). Husserl, Wittgenstein and the Snark: Intentionality and Social Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):331-349.
Michael D. Barber (2008). Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-Conceptual Content. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (2):79-97.
Daniel J. Dwyer (2007). Husserl's Appropriation of the Psychological Concepts of Apperception and Attention. Husserl Studies 23 (2):83-118.
Michael Madary (2012). Husserl on Perceptual Constancy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):145-165.
Dan Zahavi (2004). Husserl's Noema and the Internalism-Externalism Debate. Inquiry 47 (1):42 – 66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads124 ( #12,689 of 1,699,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?