David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 13 (02):152- (2001)
Consequentialism is often criticized for failing to accommodate impersonal constraints and personal options. A common consequentialist response is to acknowledge the anticonsequentialist intuitions but to argue either that the consequentialist can, after all, accommodate the allegedly recalcitrant intuitions or that, where accommodation is impossible, the recalcitrant intuition can be dismissed for want of an adequate philosophical rationale. Whereas these consequentialist responses have some plausibility, associational duties represent a somewhat different challenge to consequentialism, inasmuch as they embody neither impersonal constraints nor personal options, but rather personal constraints. Our intuitions about associational duties resist capture within the intellectual net of consequentialism, and such duties do admit of a philosophical rationale at least as plausible as anything the consequentialist has to offer
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dorota Mokrosinska (2013). Communal Ties and Political Obligations. Ratio Juris 26 (2):187-214.
Similar books and articles
Margaret Moore (2009). Is Patriotism an Associative Duty? Journal of Ethics 13 (4):383 - 399.
Veit Bader (2005). Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism's Main Flaws. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):83 - 103.
Seth Lazar (2010). A Liberal Defence of (Some) Duties to Compatriots. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):246-257.
Thomas Pogge (2002). Cosmopolitanism: A Defence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):86-91.
Niko Kolodny (2002). Do Associative Duties Matter? Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (3):250–266.
Javier Hidalgo (2013). Associative Duties and Immigration. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (6):697-722.
Jonathan Seglow (2010). Associative Duties and Global Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):54-73.
Alec Walen & David Wasserman (2012). Agents, Impartiality, and the Priority of Claims Over Duties: Diagnosing Why Thomson Still Gets the Trolley Problem Wrong by Appeal to the “Mechanics of Claims”. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):545-571.
Seth Lazar (2009). Debate: Do Associative Duties Really Not Matter? Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1):90-101.
Marco Mazzone (2011). Schemata and Associative Processes in Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8):2148-2159.
David R. Shanks (2009). The Associative Nature of Human Associative Learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):225-226.
Lea Ypi, Robert E. Goodin & Christian Barry (2009). Associative Duties, Global Justice, and the Colonies. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (2):103-135.
Bas van der Vossen (2011). Associative Political Obligations: Their Potential. Philosophy Compass 6 (7):488-496.
Philip Cook (2012). On the Duties of Shared Parenting. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):168-181.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads34 ( #54,926 of 1,101,953 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #34,117 of 1,101,953 )
How can I increase my downloads?