Inference and explanation in cognitive neuropsychology
|Abstract||The question posed by Dunn and Kirsner (D&K) is an instance of a more general one: What can we infer from data? One answer, if we are talking about logically valid deductive inference, is that we cannot infer theories from data. A theory is supposed to explain the data and so cannot be a mere summary of the data to be explained. The truth of an explanatory theory goes beyond the data and so is never logically guaranteed by the data. This is not just a point about cognitive neuropsychology, or even about psychology in general. It is a familiar point about all science|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Edwin H. -C. Hung (2005). Projective Explanation: How Theories Explain Empirical Data in Spite of Theory-Data Incommensurability. Synthese 145 (1):111 - 129.
Clark Glymour (2012). On the Possibility of Inference to the Best Explanation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):461-469.
Jeffrey Bub (1994). Testing Models of Cognition Through the Analysis of Brain-Damaged Patients. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):837-55.
C. Glymour (1994). On the Methods of Cognitive Neuropsychology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (3):815-35.
Jeffrey Bub (1994). Is Cognitive Neuropsychology Possible? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1:417-427.
Martin Davies (2010). Double Dissociation: Understanding its Role in Cognitive Neuropsychology. Mind and Language 25 (5):500-540.
Added to index2010-07-19
Total downloads29 ( #48,035 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?