David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philo 2 (1):51-61 (1999)
This essay is a response to Michael Martin’s “Why the Resurrection Is Initially Improbable,” Philo, Vol. 1, No.1. I argue that Martin has not succeeded in achieving his aim of showing that the Resurrection is initially improbable and thus, by Bayes’s Theorem, implausible. I respond to five of Martin’s arguments: (1) the “particular time and place argument”; (2) the claim that there is no plausible Christian theory of why Jesus should have been incarnated and resurrected; (3) the claim that the Resurrection accounts in the New Testament are unreliable; (4) Martin’s assumptions about how one establishes the initial probability of Resurrection; and (5) the use Martin makes of Bayes’s Theorem to discredit belief in the Resurrection
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stephen T. Davis (2000). The Rationality of Resurrection for Christians. Philo 3 (1):41-51.
Michael Martin (2000). Christianity and the Rationality of the Resurrection. Philo 3 (1):52-62.
Michael Martin (1998). Why the Resurrection is Initially Improbable. Philo 1 (1):63-73.
James A. Keller (1988). Comtemporary Christian Doubts About the Resurrection. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):40-60.
Eric Steinhart (2008). The Revision Theory of Resurrection. Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
Stephen T. Davis (2003). The Rationality of Christian Belief in Resurrection: A Reply to Michael Martin. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):501 - 517.
Robert Greg Cavin (1995). Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus? Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
R. Douglas Geivett (2001). Replies to Evan Fales: On the Evidence of Miracles and the Historicity of the Resurrection. Philosophia Christi 3 (1):53 - 60.
James F. Ross (2001). Together with the Body I Love. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:1-18.
Gary R. Habermas (2001). Replies to Evan Fales: On the Resurrection Appearances of Jesus. Philosophia Christi 3 (1):76 - 87.
Stephen T. Davis (2001). Physicalism and Resurrection. In Kevin J. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2007). Persons and the Metaphysics of Resurrection. Religious Studies 43 (3):333-348.
Andrei A. Buckareff & Joel S. Van Wagenen (2010). Surviving Resurrection. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):123-139.
A. Olding (1970). Resurrection Bodies and Resurrection Worlds. Mind 79 (316):581-585.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads20 ( #94,667 of 1,413,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #41,815 of 1,413,361 )
How can I increase my downloads?