Environmental Ethics 28 (2):115-128 (2006)
|Abstract||Biocentric individualism, the position that all life has intrinsic value, is of no practical help in policy-making contexts. Examples commonly used in discussions of biocentric individualism are themselves alienating and threaten to make environmental philosophy appear irrelevant to policy decisions. Hence, both biocentric individualism and typical discussions of it are problematic for those wishing to make environmental philosophy useful in policy. A recent article by Jason Kawall, in which he attempts to defend biocentric individualism, demonstrates these points|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. B. Madison (1990). How Individualistic is Methodological Individualism? Critical Review 4 (1-2):41-60.
John Mizzoni (2004). St. Francis, Paul Taylor, and Franciscan Biocentrism. Environmental Ethics 26 (1):41-56.
Leslie Paul Thiele (1995). Nature and Freedom: A Heideggerian Critique of Biocentric and Sociocentric Environmentalism. Environmental Ethics 17 (2):171-190.
A. T. Anchustegui (2005). Biocentric Ethics and Animal Prosperity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):105-119.
Paul W. Taylor (1983). In Defense of Biocentrism. Environmental Ethics 5 (3):237-243.
Karánn Durland (2008). The Prospects of a Viable Biocentric Egalitarianism. Environmental Ethics 30 (4):401-416.
Mark A. Michael (1996). To Swat or Not to Swat: Pesky Flies, Environmental Ethics, and the Supererogatory. Environmental Ethics 18 (2):165-180.
James P. Sterba (1995). From Biocentric Individualism to Biocentric Pluralism. Environmental Ethics 17 (2):191-207.
Jason Kawall (2003). Reverence for Life as a Viable Environmental Virtue. Environmental Ethics 25 (4):339-358.
Jason Kawall (2008). On Behalf of Biocentric Individualism. Environmental Ethics 30 (1):69-88.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?