Graduate studies at Western
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475 (2009)
|Abstract||It is widely held that there is a legal right to privacy that plays such a central role in a number of important US Supreme Court decisions. There is however a great deal of dispute about whether there is a moral right to privacy and if there is, what grounds the right. Before this can be determined, we must be clear about the nature of privacy, something that is not clearly understood and that, as we shall see, is often confused with the right to privacy. I shall begin with a critical discussion of various views about the nature of privacy. I shall then present my own account, and show how it meets the objections that have been raised against other views. Lastly, I shall close with a discussion about whether privacy is a moral right.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Beate Rössler (ed.) (2004). Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations. Stanford University Press.
Richard Arneson (2000). Egalitarian Justice Versus the Right to Privacy? Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (02):91-.
Madison Powers (1996). A Cognitive Access Definition of Privacy. Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386.
Mark Alfino & G. Randolph Mayes (2003). Reconstructing the Right to Privacy. Social Theory & Practice 29 (1):1-18.
Lars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Alan Rubel (2011). The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy. Res Publica 17 (3):275-290.
Ferdinand David Schoeman (ed.) (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-11-12
Total downloads88 ( #10,102 of 731,507 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,055 of 731,507 )
How can I increase my downloads?